Thinking of moving
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d36d/5d36dca19fc8083cb7d56929df795d8e1daf4f1c" alt=""
Traditionalism is all well and good, but progress is progress.
Money could be an issue, but apparently most (but significantly, not all) of the money will be coming from the private sector. Does that mean someone else will own the ground ?
Any new stadium could be used to hold major events, the possibility of the World Cup in 2018 or major music concerts. I remember the three games at the City Ground during Euro '96 and they hardly left a lasting impression on the city, and we would be lucky to get more than three games next time. And isn't the Nottingham Arena big enough for major pop concerts ?
Other clubs have blown their stack on ground improvements (Notts C, Bradford) only to see themselves fall down the leagues in front of half empty shells. Others have mortgaged their futures on identikit flat-packed Ikea stadium indistinguishable from each other without the names of the corporate sponsors picked out in white seating.
Forest don't struggle to get 20,000 at home, but they would to get 40,000 - 50,000 without some serious rethinking of ticket prices. If we halved tickets, would we get twice as many people in ? I think not.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35a6e/35a6efca709476899afd19506c0aedcb1890a074" alt=""
Personally, my biggest loss would be this, and any true Forest fan will know what I mean.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b0da/5b0da3cdceb46107d0363bbf5afb5fe716e55185" alt=""
I was 4 years old when I first experienced that, and it has never ceased to make the hairs on the back of my neck stand on end EVERY SINGLE TIME in the 34 years since.
You can say no to everything and use tradition as a blanket excuse, but some things are just irreplaceable.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home